Good. With both Blue Origin and Space-X having flown heavy boosters, there's no need for a US$2 billion per launch Boeing booster, even if it works.

SLS is super heavy class like Starship. It deploys about 100 tons to orbit in Block 1 configuration.

New Glenn deploys half that. Closer to a Falcon Heavy.

You can't really do a moon program without a super heavy rocket.

Assuming they contract out to both those venders. Having a single vendor win the contracts lead to this mess to begin with

I think Jared Isaacman's closeness to Musk gives him added motivation to award contracts to non-SpaceX vendors (once he's confirmed), because he'll seek to disprove claims he's biased in favor of SpaceX

The motive is Boeing didnt deliver, doesnt deliver, and cannot deliver.

That depends on the application. If we are talking safety critical human space flight SLS would be preferable over SpaceX.

Wait, you mean the SLS that could not bring astronauts back from the International Space Station? It's nine months in and they are still up there.

You’re picking Boeing for their safety record? Why is that?

How can that possibly be true?

I mean one is actually flying right now and one ain't

should have been done 5 years ago